Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Publius2, post: 24685398, member: 105571&quot;]What is causing confusion?&nbsp; The methods of attribution are covered very well in the Bugert books.&nbsp; It sometimes requires some close attention to attribute the correct die marriage if the markers are subtle or the coin is well worn.&nbsp; But your coin is nice and well-preserved.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>Or are you looking for something other than the die marriage when you ask about the &quot;variety&quot;.&nbsp; As far as a type coin goes, this would be the Red Book Variety 1 Resumed with Weight of Variety 2, 1854-1858.</p><p><br /></p><p>You noted that you bought it for the die clashes and I too find them pretty cool.&nbsp; But be aware that die clashes do not make for a die marriage or a Red Book variety.&nbsp; They can, though, be helpful tools for attributing a die marriage.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is my coin of that Red Book variety.&nbsp; It is die marriage WB-101, Normal Date with Type 1 Reverse.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1575002[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in