Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;7Jags, post: 25482406, member: 78719&quot;]Yes, I agree with that. The first was sold on by Spink as part of the &quot;Waterbird&quot; collection and interestingly graded NGC 58. I concur that this appears cleaned as it definitely has that appearance. While the second may also have been cleaned long ago will agree it more attractive. It was graded PCGS 50.</p><p>I believe the second under graded and the first overgraded. As readers are no doubt aware, this issue is notoriously poorly struck and even a little bit of usage will relegate to the VF level or so.</p><p>The fields and edge as opposed to the devices are possibly more useful in grading in this instance....[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in