Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1853 Seated Lib Qtr, No Arrows
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 6793079, member: 105571"]I believe your coin is a counterfeit. It does not show the re-punching of the 5 that is part of every genuine 1853 No Arrows and which shows on even well-worn coins. Also, the marks at the 3 do not appear to be the same as the overdate re-punching on genuine coins. It looks more like someone modified an 8 to make it look like a 3 and clumsily at that.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, a genuine 1853 No Arrows has a specified weight of 6.88 grams but all later quarters have a specified weight of 6.22 grams. It is much more likely that your coin started out at 6.22 grams and lost weight due to circulation and metal removal at the 8/3 down to 6.09 grams (a loss of 2.1%) than to have gone from 6.88 grams down to 6.09 grams ( a loss of 11.5%). </p><p><br /></p><p>In Jason Poe's excellent book The Art and Science of Grading Coins (highly recommended) on pages 132-134, he describes his own "weight loss due to wear" experiment and also quotes a 1902 Mint Director study. Both of those efforts led to a 4-5% loss of weight from uncirculated condition to well-worn condition. I think you would agree that your coin at 2.1% is much closer to that than 11.5%.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin doesn't show signs of metal removal from removal of the arrows on the obverse nor the rays on the reverse. Along with the weight loss percentages mentioned above, the 1858 coin resumed the characteristics of the Variety 1 quarter but with the weight reduction of variety two. This means that an 1858 quarter is the same with regard to its diameter specification as the 1853 No Arrows but because the 1858 is lighter, the 1858 is thinner. You might check the thickness at the rim against some Variety 1 quarters-I can't find that specification right now.</p><p><br /></p><p>My references state the most common gauge for the Philadelphia mint used for all quarters from 1838 to 1860 was 113 reeds. If your coin is a modified 1858 it would show the same 113 reeds as a genuine 1853 No Arrows. But if your coin's reed count is different than 113, it would be another indication that your coin is counterfeit.</p><p><br /></p><p>All in all, I think it is far more likely that your coin is a counterfeit than not. I would grade your quarter around F-12. Greysheet lists that at $2200 so if genuine this is quite a valuable coin. Probably worth it to have a TPG take a look. </p><p><br /></p><p>My genuine wish for you is that it's genuine but I think the preponderance of evidence points otherwise.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 6793079, member: 105571"]I believe your coin is a counterfeit. It does not show the re-punching of the 5 that is part of every genuine 1853 No Arrows and which shows on even well-worn coins. Also, the marks at the 3 do not appear to be the same as the overdate re-punching on genuine coins. It looks more like someone modified an 8 to make it look like a 3 and clumsily at that. Also, a genuine 1853 No Arrows has a specified weight of 6.88 grams but all later quarters have a specified weight of 6.22 grams. It is much more likely that your coin started out at 6.22 grams and lost weight due to circulation and metal removal at the 8/3 down to 6.09 grams (a loss of 2.1%) than to have gone from 6.88 grams down to 6.09 grams ( a loss of 11.5%). In Jason Poe's excellent book The Art and Science of Grading Coins (highly recommended) on pages 132-134, he describes his own "weight loss due to wear" experiment and also quotes a 1902 Mint Director study. Both of those efforts led to a 4-5% loss of weight from uncirculated condition to well-worn condition. I think you would agree that your coin at 2.1% is much closer to that than 11.5%. The coin doesn't show signs of metal removal from removal of the arrows on the obverse nor the rays on the reverse. Along with the weight loss percentages mentioned above, the 1858 coin resumed the characteristics of the Variety 1 quarter but with the weight reduction of variety two. This means that an 1858 quarter is the same with regard to its diameter specification as the 1853 No Arrows but because the 1858 is lighter, the 1858 is thinner. You might check the thickness at the rim against some Variety 1 quarters-I can't find that specification right now. My references state the most common gauge for the Philadelphia mint used for all quarters from 1838 to 1860 was 113 reeds. If your coin is a modified 1858 it would show the same 113 reeds as a genuine 1853 No Arrows. But if your coin's reed count is different than 113, it would be another indication that your coin is counterfeit. All in all, I think it is far more likely that your coin is a counterfeit than not. I would grade your quarter around F-12. Greysheet lists that at $2200 so if genuine this is quite a valuable coin. Probably worth it to have a TPG take a look. My genuine wish for you is that it's genuine but I think the preponderance of evidence points otherwise.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1853 Seated Lib Qtr, No Arrows
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...