Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1853 Qtr and 1868 Nickel
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Irespire, post: 766892, member: 14858"]True. The color made it appear more worn in the small photo than it really was.</p><p><br /></p><p>However:</p><p><br /></p><p>This is more what I think of when I think "XF-40":</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=1987&lot=1222&imagetype=j2" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=1987&lot=1222&imagetype=j2" rel="nofollow">http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=1987&lot=1222&imagetype=j2</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Notice how this following piece was graded AU details...reminds me of the OP's coin with a weak strike:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248" rel="nofollow">http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Poorly struck XF-45: Notice the wear on the left leg that is mostly (presumably, a bit hard to see from the pics) absent from OP's coin; the coin easily wore there because of the bad strike:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2244&lot=1602&imagetype=j2" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2244&lot=1602&imagetype=j2" rel="nofollow">http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2244&lot=1602&imagetype=j2</a></p><p><br /></p><p>And here is another 'hammered strike':</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2142&lot=1121&imagetype=j2" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2142&lot=1121&imagetype=j2" rel="nofollow">http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2142&lot=1121&imagetype=j2</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p> Upon up close examination I do not see much wear on the HA coin you gave at all, which makes me think that this example is actually undergraded. I have, in my opinion, seen coins like that in AU slabs. I also think whoever got it at that price got a great deal because it still retains a lot of eye appeal. A textbook example of people buying the slab, not the coin. Here's a comparable coin in terms of wear IMO, or close:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248" rel="nofollow">http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I maintain that the OP's coin has little actual wear either, but the heritage example is definitely nicer due to the strike and should have brought $150+ easily. I'm surprised it only brought in $80. The OP's coin is probably around $100-$120 thus, regardless of 'wear grade' because of the weak strike. It appears that there are many factors involved with this, and that the strikes vary to the extreme.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Irespire, post: 766892, member: 14858"]True. The color made it appear more worn in the small photo than it really was. However: This is more what I think of when I think "XF-40": [URL]http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=1987&lot=1222&imagetype=j2[/URL] Notice how this following piece was graded AU details...reminds me of the OP's coin with a weak strike: [URL]http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248[/URL] Poorly struck XF-45: Notice the wear on the left leg that is mostly (presumably, a bit hard to see from the pics) absent from OP's coin; the coin easily wore there because of the bad strike: [URL]http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2244&lot=1602&imagetype=j2[/URL] And here is another 'hammered strike': [URL]http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2142&lot=1121&imagetype=j2[/URL] Upon up close examination I do not see much wear on the HA coin you gave at all, which makes me think that this example is actually undergraded. I have, in my opinion, seen coins like that in AU slabs. I also think whoever got it at that price got a great deal because it still retains a lot of eye appeal. A textbook example of people buying the slab, not the coin. Here's a comparable coin in terms of wear IMO, or close: [URL]http://teletrade.com/coins/lot.asp?auction=2026&lot=1248[/URL] I maintain that the OP's coin has little actual wear either, but the heritage example is definitely nicer due to the strike and should have brought $150+ easily. I'm surprised it only brought in $80. The OP's coin is probably around $100-$120 thus, regardless of 'wear grade' because of the weak strike. It appears that there are many factors involved with this, and that the strikes vary to the extreme.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
CoinTalk
>
What's it Worth
>
1853 Qtr and 1868 Nickel
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...