Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1853 Large cent
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="HandsomeToad, post: 592532, member: 12965"]I agree that there is no easy way to attribute these or any coin that I know but my point was, when you do have a known variety within a group, with only medium quality obverse pics, you can't attribute it with Bob's pics, even though the choices have three distinct date placements. That had nothing to do with normally attributing these, since date placement can't be used by itself but it's a good start and I use the placement of the Date, LIBERTY, and the entire reverse on DBC's but generally speaking, I can rule out many DBC's by date alone but not with Bob's book. The average BHC on Ebay cannot be attributed by Bob's book and if it helps to have another book to use, then BINGO, Bob's book is clearly lacking! But I will admit I'm a picture attributer and I use the pics in Bowers new book and only read the writing when it matches or comes close and I use Tom Decks pics for attributing all the time and there's very little writing with his pics and when I attribute Fugios, I use the Fugio plate coins on Notre Dame, so I'm used to attributing by pics. And on Fugios, I key in on the I in Business and its placement compared to the dash above it or lack of a dash, then I branch out to the cinquefoils once I find one close and I can attribute a Fugio fairly fast with that method. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p> </p><p>So my original point was, which had to do with the OP coin, unless it has a very distinguishing feature, it is hard to attribute BHC's using Bob's book so I won't be attributing it. :goofer: And if I find one on Ebay that I suspect may be a R-3 or better, I go to Heritage and start running down the list until I find it but I don't use Bob's book unless there is a cud or distinguishing mark of some kind. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p> </p><p>Ribbit <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p> </p><p>Ps: Give me a Connecticut to attribute, over a BHC, anyday! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="HandsomeToad, post: 592532, member: 12965"]I agree that there is no easy way to attribute these or any coin that I know but my point was, when you do have a known variety within a group, with only medium quality obverse pics, you can't attribute it with Bob's pics, even though the choices have three distinct date placements. That had nothing to do with normally attributing these, since date placement can't be used by itself but it's a good start and I use the placement of the Date, LIBERTY, and the entire reverse on DBC's but generally speaking, I can rule out many DBC's by date alone but not with Bob's book. The average BHC on Ebay cannot be attributed by Bob's book and if it helps to have another book to use, then BINGO, Bob's book is clearly lacking! But I will admit I'm a picture attributer and I use the pics in Bowers new book and only read the writing when it matches or comes close and I use Tom Decks pics for attributing all the time and there's very little writing with his pics and when I attribute Fugios, I use the Fugio plate coins on Notre Dame, so I'm used to attributing by pics. And on Fugios, I key in on the I in Business and its placement compared to the dash above it or lack of a dash, then I branch out to the cinquefoils once I find one close and I can attribute a Fugio fairly fast with that method. :D So my original point was, which had to do with the OP coin, unless it has a very distinguishing feature, it is hard to attribute BHC's using Bob's book so I won't be attributing it. :goofer: And if I find one on Ebay that I suspect may be a R-3 or better, I go to Heritage and start running down the list until I find it but I don't use Bob's book unless there is a cud or distinguishing mark of some kind. ;) Ribbit :) Ps: Give me a Connecticut to attribute, over a BHC, anyday! :D[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1853 Large cent
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...