Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;SuperDave, post: 2508034, member: 1892&quot;]For some reason, that sort of insulting behavior is tolerated around here to an extent. I have employed the Ignore feature for the person who&#039;s been posting that, and as a result I don&#039;t see his posts.</p><p><br /></p><p>I should have looked closer to the reverse the first time around. In your much-better recent set of images, an absolute <b><i>dealbreaker</i></b> of a feature appears plainly - the absence of any detail in the center and at the top curve of the eagle&#039;s right (viewer&#039;s left) wing. </p><p><br /></p><p>You&#039;ll <b><i>never</i></b> see that on a Seated Dollar. There is <i>nothing</i> field-level inside the wing. That&#039;s an area of relatively low relief, meaning it <i>doesn&#039;t</i> get weakly struck, <i>doesn&#039;t</i> wear away during the die&#039;s life, and remains clearly detailed down into VG grade on all examples of the type. The coin is counterfeit, and there is no doubt in my mind.</p><p><br /></p><p>Like I said earlier, 1842 is a popular date for it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in