Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 3218837, member: 24314&quot;]Typecoin, posted: &quot;This is <i>exactly</i> why I have spoken so strongly against market grading. It just creates confusion. [<span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)"><b>AMEN!</b></span>] The number assigned to this coin has no bearing on its state of preservation, but its value instead.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>How this is handled in EAC is that this coin would be graded F-15 sharpness, net (value) VG-10. Clear and no confusion.&nbsp; </b>This coin is, to me, a details coin. I would have described it as such if it was raw.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>Actually I&#039;m very confused.&nbsp; Which is it by EAC Standards. <b><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 102)"> F-15</span></b> sharpness or Net <span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 102)"><b>VG-10</b></span>?&nbsp; Does it have 2 EAC grades?&nbsp; Is this one of those <span style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0)">RARE cases where EAC and PCGS agree as both net graded the coin? </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in