Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1805 quarter eagle
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="charlottedude, post: 2354605, member: 26010"]Yes - dirt does happen to raise eye appeal... particularly with circulated gold.</p><p><br /></p><p>Here's another one from the SDP that would most likely make some people shudder... ewwww! </p><p><img src="http://i771.photobucket.com/albums/xx357/abisgator/BlueCC/1803_zps76a5b418.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>And a more recent photo of the coin -</p><p><img src="http://i771.photobucket.com/albums/xx357/abisgator/CAC/IMG_0160_zps9a0a2ca9.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>Insider seems to really sing NCS' praises, and I will say that NCS does provide a valuable service, but only to an extent. They are good at removing unsightly residue, putty, excessive dirt (such as from a metal-detected coin) and other seriously detracting substances. To imply that any gold coin with minimal dirt on it should be "conserved" is simply wrong... dare I say ignorant. There were very many gold coins recovered from several shipwrecks over the last 10-15 years... nearly all were conserved, and it was probably a good thing there were so many to work on, as the conservators perfected their cocktails. Many of those recovered shipwreck coins look great, as they were otherwise MS coins... but some of them ended up looking so bland, so devoid of skin and character, they're just unattractive. As some posters like to incorporate grade school barfing emoticons, I'll go as far to say that nearly every single <u>circulated</u> silver shipwreck coin that's been NCS'd has made me want to do just that. I've had personal experience with NCS. An 1857-S $3 gold which I purchased raw. it had some residue in the upper-right obverse, but was otherwise a very attractive, original coin. I sent it in to NGC for grading, but they recommended conservation to remove the residue. I agreed and paid for the additional service. When I received the coin, it was in an AU-53 holder, the small area of residue was gone, but the coin was also completely devoid of its original patina and skin -- stripped... totally bland. I got rid of it as soon as I could. Never again..., but hey, I'm just a novice collector... what do I know?</p><p><br /></p><p>'dude[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="charlottedude, post: 2354605, member: 26010"]Yes - dirt does happen to raise eye appeal... particularly with circulated gold. Here's another one from the SDP that would most likely make some people shudder... ewwww! [IMG]http://i771.photobucket.com/albums/xx357/abisgator/BlueCC/1803_zps76a5b418.jpg[/IMG] And a more recent photo of the coin - [IMG]http://i771.photobucket.com/albums/xx357/abisgator/CAC/IMG_0160_zps9a0a2ca9.jpg[/IMG] Insider seems to really sing NCS' praises, and I will say that NCS does provide a valuable service, but only to an extent. They are good at removing unsightly residue, putty, excessive dirt (such as from a metal-detected coin) and other seriously detracting substances. To imply that any gold coin with minimal dirt on it should be "conserved" is simply wrong... dare I say ignorant. There were very many gold coins recovered from several shipwrecks over the last 10-15 years... nearly all were conserved, and it was probably a good thing there were so many to work on, as the conservators perfected their cocktails. Many of those recovered shipwreck coins look great, as they were otherwise MS coins... but some of them ended up looking so bland, so devoid of skin and character, they're just unattractive. As some posters like to incorporate grade school barfing emoticons, I'll go as far to say that nearly every single [U]circulated[/U] silver shipwreck coin that's been NCS'd has made me want to do just that. I've had personal experience with NCS. An 1857-S $3 gold which I purchased raw. it had some residue in the upper-right obverse, but was otherwise a very attractive, original coin. I sent it in to NGC for grading, but they recommended conservation to remove the residue. I agreed and paid for the additional service. When I received the coin, it was in an AU-53 holder, the small area of residue was gone, but the coin was also completely devoid of its original patina and skin -- stripped... totally bland. I got rid of it as soon as I could. Never again..., but hey, I'm just a novice collector... what do I know? 'dude[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1805 quarter eagle
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...