Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2608207, member: 21705&quot;]Thanks. It actually looks more distant than both comps I&#039;m using. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m kind of to the point of calling it un-attributable since both attributions would be flawed with conflicting evidence for both NC-2 and S-230 attributions. The reverse seems so easy and the obverse so - not. Excluding both only leaves a new die pairing and none of the others seem close. This one is too worn and damaged to make that call. </p><p><br /></p><p>I suppose corrosion may have created a gap at LI and mimicked the die crack exactly at ER on a S-230. It&#039;s probably more likely than an unknown die. But I can&#039;t call it a S-230 either.</p><p><br /></p><p>It goes in the close but no attribution pile.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in