Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2607239, member: 21705&quot;]The accident was thinking the reverse identification was sufficient for variety identification. Often a single side is sufficient if it is not paired with a second or more opposite side. That&#039;s what my database indicated when it failed to pick up the S-230 as another variety using Reverse D.</p><p><br /></p><p>But it was my mistake from failing to notice this earlier before paying the buy it now price. </p><p><br /></p><p>The probabilities are that it is the S-230 R1 rather than the NC-2 R6, but the ID is far from certain either way. I keep seeing different evidence pointing to different conclusions. It&#039;s FRUSTRATING![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in