Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1799 Cent PCGS VF30 CAC
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Breakdown, post: 988069, member: 19532"]Doug,</p><p><br /></p><p>I understand my first two questions were not directly applicable to whether the coin in the OT should be in a Genuine holder or not holdered at all but I think there is a common theme: the ideal of a single, consistent grading standard that should be applied to coins, regardless of age, rarity, pedigree, etc.</p><p><br /></p><p>I appreciate your answers and even agree with you on the first two points.:yes: Early Walkers were not struck like those from the 30s and 40s and so an adjusted scale is appropriate. I also think the loosening of standards for key date coins only leads to confusion in the marketplace and arbitrary price differentials between coins that may be graded a point apart (say a 26-S Buffalo in 64 versus 65) that is unjustified.</p><p><br /></p><p>However, I see a possible inconsistency in your answer to the first two questions. You say that a different standard is justified for early Walkers but not for key dates. However, many key dates in Buffalos, for instance, are condition rarities because of strike deficiencies. The 19-D or 20-D are great examples -- even most MS65 PCGS examples are weak strikes (think of a nice smooth buffalo head north and west of the horn) and they were weak strikes the day they left the mint. As Bowers put it, the press attendants at the Denver mint became "increasingly inattentive" during this period. So is a looser standard justified for those coins because they were consistently softly struck?<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie5" alt=":confused:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> </p><p><br /></p><p>Still learning!<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie2" alt=";)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Jeff[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Breakdown, post: 988069, member: 19532"]Doug, I understand my first two questions were not directly applicable to whether the coin in the OT should be in a Genuine holder or not holdered at all but I think there is a common theme: the ideal of a single, consistent grading standard that should be applied to coins, regardless of age, rarity, pedigree, etc. I appreciate your answers and even agree with you on the first two points.:yes: Early Walkers were not struck like those from the 30s and 40s and so an adjusted scale is appropriate. I also think the loosening of standards for key date coins only leads to confusion in the marketplace and arbitrary price differentials between coins that may be graded a point apart (say a 26-S Buffalo in 64 versus 65) that is unjustified. However, I see a possible inconsistency in your answer to the first two questions. You say that a different standard is justified for early Walkers but not for key dates. However, many key dates in Buffalos, for instance, are condition rarities because of strike deficiencies. The 19-D or 20-D are great examples -- even most MS65 PCGS examples are weak strikes (think of a nice smooth buffalo head north and west of the horn) and they were weak strikes the day they left the mint. As Bowers put it, the press attendants at the Denver mint became "increasingly inattentive" during this period. So is a looser standard justified for those coins because they were consistently softly struck?:confused: Still learning!;) Jeff[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1799 Cent PCGS VF30 CAC
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...