Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Fish, post: 622791, member: 6034&quot;]That is a nice-looking coin, and awful familiar-looking to boot - did it come out of the Heritage sale of the Kochel collection last year?&nbsp; He had a ton of errors, mostly low-grade, cleaned, and/or corroded.</p><p><br /></p><p>Oh, and Matt&#039;s right, it is C2.</p><p><br /></p><p>!797s and 1795s are often stuck on TAL tokens, or spoiled large cents.&nbsp; Look at the edge lettering, I&#039;ve seen at least one where the lettering was the only indicator of the undertype - it even allowed identification of the specific year of the TAL used.&nbsp; Visible undertype does justify some premium, with the amount being dependant on the amount and aesthetics, as well as the coin itself.</p><p><br /></p><p>I myself don&#039;t own a piece with visible undertype, but would be happy with a piece like that.&nbsp; Nice coin.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in