Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 2710215, member: 21705&quot;]I wouldn&#039;t be so quick to eliminate the S-139 due to the location of the &quot;berry&quot; relative to the (N)T.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think I see sufficient evidence of a possible double strike to throw that relationship off. Particularly look at the N where I believe both strikes are most in evidence&nbsp; and what appears to be the leaf above E from one strike actually over the highest part of the E of the other strike.</p><p><br /></p><p>I initially considered PMD as the culprit, but the berry in question is in the right place relative to the outer berry and leaf above if it is Reverse P.</p><p><br /></p><p>The position of (S)T(A) closer to the S than the A along with letter dentil position make a good case for Reverse P along with a pretty good case for the obverse being Obverse 17.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in