Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Marshall, post: 1057533, member: 21705&quot;]It&#039;s possible that it&#039;s a later state V and part of the reason the die was retired. It does appear that the failure of the die at 7 and A(T) may be there. It looks like it&#039;s just about to be a CUD at the 7 which was postulated, but not seen by Breen. </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s also possible that it is some type of strikethrough.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in