Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1795 Jefferson Head Large Cent
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1736892, member: 66"]Harper was trying to win a coining contract. He produced his own dies and planchets and demonstrated his coining ability to a committee of government officials in the basement of his sawmill. (Same basement where the 1792 half dismes were coined.) The coins struck were distributed to the committee. Harper did not get a contract and later when they realized that it probably wasn't a good idea to leave the dies with Harper they were recovered and Harper was reimbursed $100 for his expenses.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Jefferson heads were known at least as early as 1869. They may have been known earlier than that but 1869 was when they got the name Jefferson Heads. Frank Stewart discussed Harpers bid for a coinage contract in 1924. Breen decided in 1952 that the Jefferson heads were the pieces that Harper struck for the committee. This was probably just speculation on Breen's part because as far as I know there is no definitive proof linking the Jefferson heads to Harper. There is no official description of what he struck other than "cents".</p><p><br /></p><p>Personally I believe the Jefferson heads are simply contemporary counterfeits. There are just some things that don't make sense if this was a presentation to impress a government committee. The engraving is crude compared to the official cents, hardly something to convince the committee that you can do better than the mint. Secondly, for a simple demonstration why are there so many variations? There is only one obv die but two different reverses, two different planchet thicknesses, plain edge and two different sets of lettered edge dies. There are less than 75 Jefferson Head cents out there, but there are five different varieties! It would seem to me that if you are trying to show how you can do a better job than the mint, you would want to rapidly strike a large number of the same coin, not just a few with a lot of changes. That sounds to me like someone who makes up a few cents when he needs them and in small batches. (A cent was a significant amount of money then.)</p><p><br /></p><p>As for the bust it was not intended to be anyone in particular, just a poor copy of the head on the current cent.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Conder101, post: 1736892, member: 66"]Harper was trying to win a coining contract. He produced his own dies and planchets and demonstrated his coining ability to a committee of government officials in the basement of his sawmill. (Same basement where the 1792 half dismes were coined.) The coins struck were distributed to the committee. Harper did not get a contract and later when they realized that it probably wasn't a good idea to leave the dies with Harper they were recovered and Harper was reimbursed $100 for his expenses. The Jefferson heads were known at least as early as 1869. They may have been known earlier than that but 1869 was when they got the name Jefferson Heads. Frank Stewart discussed Harpers bid for a coinage contract in 1924. Breen decided in 1952 that the Jefferson heads were the pieces that Harper struck for the committee. This was probably just speculation on Breen's part because as far as I know there is no definitive proof linking the Jefferson heads to Harper. There is no official description of what he struck other than "cents". Personally I believe the Jefferson heads are simply contemporary counterfeits. There are just some things that don't make sense if this was a presentation to impress a government committee. The engraving is crude compared to the official cents, hardly something to convince the committee that you can do better than the mint. Secondly, for a simple demonstration why are there so many variations? There is only one obv die but two different reverses, two different planchet thicknesses, plain edge and two different sets of lettered edge dies. There are less than 75 Jefferson Head cents out there, but there are five different varieties! It would seem to me that if you are trying to show how you can do a better job than the mint, you would want to rapidly strike a large number of the same coin, not just a few with a lot of changes. That sounds to me like someone who makes up a few cents when he needs them and in small batches. (A cent was a significant amount of money then.) As for the bust it was not intended to be anyone in particular, just a poor copy of the head on the current cent.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
1795 Jefferson Head Large Cent
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...