Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;900fine, post: 298999, member: 6036&quot;]The mint didn&#039;t break out numbers for the two seperate years. The number 86,416 is the total mintage for 1794 + 1795 combined. I bet there&#039;s some interesting history in that; hopefully there&#039;s a specialist / historian who can tell the tale.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Like other flowing hair silver, the 1795 is much more common* than the 1794. Based on NGC census, there are almost three times as many &#039;95s as &#039;94s (326 to 110). Similar story at PCGS - 470 to 169.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If one takes a 3:1 ratio and applies it to the total mintage 86,416, it works out to <b>64,812</b> 1795s and <b>21,604</b> 1794s. But that&#039;s just a scientific wild guess, nothing more.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><font size="1">* &quot;common&quot; is a relative term !</font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in