Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Larry Moran, post: 811891, member: 4580&quot;]<b>Wow, another anomaly</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, another oddity on yours, yarm.&nbsp; I like the way that we can relatively date tokens like Conders and Civil War Tokens from die chips, cracks, etc.&nbsp; I&#039;m quite sure mine was struck before your example.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>It&#039;s a terrific photo, too.&nbsp; Is it from Heritage Auctions, or did you take it?&nbsp; It looks to be MS-65 minimum, based on seeing one side only.&nbsp; The only thing that could be better would be demonstrating luster and color more vividly.&nbsp; There are tradeoffs in photography, to be sure, and I like to show the luster well when possible.&nbsp; Nothing shows luster better than a coin tilted toward a light source, or the use of axial lighting, imho.&nbsp; Of course, slabbed coins do not lend themselves to use of either of those techniques, due to the &#039;glare factor.&#039;</p><p><br /></p><p>BTW, I&#039;ve heard about a terrific new resource for Conder Token collectors to be released soon, but am sworn to secrecy since I have been invited to preview the materials, and have only been studying them for a couple of days now.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in