Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
1794 Conder Token, Somerset, Bath DH 26, UNC
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 810089, member: 4580"]<b>I found the 'spot' on mine, too, full of mint luster</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Catbert...</p><p><br /></p><p>When you mentioned the 'spot,' which had never really attracted my close attention, I looked in Dalton & Hamer and could not see the same spot in the plate photo. So I enlarged my image and I can see it. In the photo of mine that you referred to, the spot is there, but the lighting has obscured it somewhat. If you look carefully, you'll see that the left side of the spot is dark, the right side is brighter, but it seems unclear to me. Another problem is that saving as a jpg for internet publication/posting always cost a bit in resolution. Given today's technology, it's unavoidable. I wish folks could see the images as they appear on my computer. They look great when printed. I often send a bunch of images to snapfish for their 4x6 glossy prints at 9¢ each. : )</p><p><br /></p><p>So, I took some more photos this morning, early, using diffused lighting and here are the results. In this smaller size, it appears somewhat dim, but in full size of about 5000 pixels wide it appears much brighter, and I was really setting it up for full sized view on other sites where small image can be expanded.</p><p><br /></p><p>Photos can differ greatly when lighting is changed, and even color balance can affect perceptions. Actually, contrast, color balance and saturation can also affect perceived focus.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/Midd2532-up1024.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><img src="http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/FrogandSpotFramed478.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Your 'spot' seems to be somewhat larger than on my token. My spot is full of mint luster. Perhaps I am being fooled by your image. They are both great tokens, no doubt. My Middlesex DH 253 is one of the cornerstones of my collection.</p><p><br /></p><p>By the way, if that is a frog, Then I would believe the tree is full of frogs. ; )</p><p><br /></p><p>I think it's just part of the tree, a stubby branch and a bunch of leaves. I've not heard anybody mention a frog before and it is not included in D&H's description. Have you heard others refer to it as a frog, or perhaps read it in a reference?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Larry Moran, post: 810089, member: 4580"][b]I found the 'spot' on mine, too, full of mint luster[/b] Catbert... When you mentioned the 'spot,' which had never really attracted my close attention, I looked in Dalton & Hamer and could not see the same spot in the plate photo. So I enlarged my image and I can see it. In the photo of mine that you referred to, the spot is there, but the lighting has obscured it somewhat. If you look carefully, you'll see that the left side of the spot is dark, the right side is brighter, but it seems unclear to me. Another problem is that saving as a jpg for internet publication/posting always cost a bit in resolution. Given today's technology, it's unavoidable. I wish folks could see the images as they appear on my computer. They look great when printed. I often send a bunch of images to snapfish for their 4x6 glossy prints at 9¢ each. : ) So, I took some more photos this morning, early, using diffused lighting and here are the results. In this smaller size, it appears somewhat dim, but in full size of about 5000 pixels wide it appears much brighter, and I was really setting it up for full sized view on other sites where small image can be expanded. Photos can differ greatly when lighting is changed, and even color balance can affect perceptions. Actually, contrast, color balance and saturation can also affect perceived focus. [IMG]http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/Midd2532-up1024.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g254/Larrymo123/after%208-9-09/FrogandSpotFramed478.jpg[/IMG] Your 'spot' seems to be somewhat larger than on my token. My spot is full of mint luster. Perhaps I am being fooled by your image. They are both great tokens, no doubt. My Middlesex DH 253 is one of the cornerstones of my collection. By the way, if that is a frog, Then I would believe the tree is full of frogs. ; ) I think it's just part of the tree, a stubby branch and a bunch of leaves. I've not heard anybody mention a frog before and it is not included in D&H's description. Have you heard others refer to it as a frog, or perhaps read it in a reference?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
1794 Conder Token, Somerset, Bath DH 26, UNC
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...