Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1787 Massachusetts cent real or a good fake?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 4965364, member: 105571"]No, Parthicus' coin is a Massachusetts cent, not a half-cent. Therefore it does not even figure into this discussion of the OP's coin. However, I got fairly close to identifying the die variety when I was looking at it because I initially could not determine that it was a half-cent. So, I started checking to see if it could be identified as a cent by the die variety since the denomination could not be discerned from the photograph.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I cannot say if the OP coin is legit or not. But die variety evidence strongly suggests that it is not a contemporary counterfeit. Usually, back in those days, counterfeiters would make up their own dies to simulate a genuine issue and those counterfeit coins struck from counterfeit dies have usually been identified by numismatists. Counterfeit coins created during the time of the original coins are called "contemporary counterfeits". No contemporary counterfeits of the Massachusetts half-cents have been identified, that I can find. So, it very unlikely that the OP's coin is a contemporary counterfeit.</p><p><br /></p><p>It could, though, be a modern counterfeit. Modern counterfeiters use various techniques to create dies using a genuine coin as the model. So, it is not unusual in the least to find modern counterfeits with the die variety characteristics of genuine issues. In fact, that is one of the methods used to identify modern counterfeits of older coins. But, it can be very difficult ranging to impossible to determine if a particular coin is a modern counterfeit, particularly from photographs. I am not an expert in identifying modern counterfeits, although some here are (Jack D. Young for one, who has multiple threads on Coin Talk on the subject). He has documented numerous examples of early American copper coins that are modern counterfeits that have been slabbed as genuine by the major TPGs. </p><p><br /></p><p>When [USER=101855]@johnmilton[/USER] and others say the coin doesn't look genuine to them, I pay attention because these folks have a lot more experience than I do. I disagree with them only reluctantly and not categorically.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Publius2, post: 4965364, member: 105571"]No, Parthicus' coin is a Massachusetts cent, not a half-cent. Therefore it does not even figure into this discussion of the OP's coin. However, I got fairly close to identifying the die variety when I was looking at it because I initially could not determine that it was a half-cent. So, I started checking to see if it could be identified as a cent by the die variety since the denomination could not be discerned from the photograph. I cannot say if the OP coin is legit or not. But die variety evidence strongly suggests that it is not a contemporary counterfeit. Usually, back in those days, counterfeiters would make up their own dies to simulate a genuine issue and those counterfeit coins struck from counterfeit dies have usually been identified by numismatists. Counterfeit coins created during the time of the original coins are called "contemporary counterfeits". No contemporary counterfeits of the Massachusetts half-cents have been identified, that I can find. So, it very unlikely that the OP's coin is a contemporary counterfeit. It could, though, be a modern counterfeit. Modern counterfeiters use various techniques to create dies using a genuine coin as the model. So, it is not unusual in the least to find modern counterfeits with the die variety characteristics of genuine issues. In fact, that is one of the methods used to identify modern counterfeits of older coins. But, it can be very difficult ranging to impossible to determine if a particular coin is a modern counterfeit, particularly from photographs. I am not an expert in identifying modern counterfeits, although some here are (Jack D. Young for one, who has multiple threads on Coin Talk on the subject). He has documented numerous examples of early American copper coins that are modern counterfeits that have been slabbed as genuine by the major TPGs. When [USER=101855]@johnmilton[/USER] and others say the coin doesn't look genuine to them, I pay attention because these folks have a lot more experience than I do. I disagree with them only reluctantly and not categorically.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
1787 Massachusetts cent real or a good fake?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...