15 years ago: the resurrection of an Emperor.

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Ocatarinetabellatchitchix, Feb 2, 2019.

  1. Ocatarinetabellatchitchix

    Ocatarinetabellatchitchix Well-Known Member

    This story is so amazing that it deserve to be told—or at least repeat. (Apologies for my poor vocabulary, english is not my mother tongue)

    The French coin
    November 28th 1900.
    It all started almost 120 years ago in France. Félix Chaillou, a farmer and winegrower—but also a part time archeologist, was excavating on his own property at Les Cléons, near the city of Nantes. He was searching for about 20 years and had already discovered prehistoric artifacts, also Gallic and Roman objects. But in the autumn of 1900, while he was working on his land, he accidentially unearthed a terracota vase containing more than 1400 little bronze coins of the Tyrans era. In the hoard he identified coins of Gordiano III, Postumus, Tetricus, Victorinus, Gallienus, Claudius the Gothicus and Aurelianus.
    805BFCD3-06BE-4F61-81EA-E132891DC624.jpeg

    But in the middle of the lot he noticed a little bronze with this legend: IMP DOMITIANUS PF AVG....Who was this unknown bearded man with the title of IMPERATOR ? And when did he live ? No historians had wrote about a DOMITIANUS who became emperor in the chaos of the third century AD. Nobody but...there were 2 sources mentioning this name. In The New Histories by the Greek Zosimus, the author wrote about the reign of Aurelian and report that 3 men were punished for the crime of treason. The names of the perpetrators of the revolt were Epitimus, Urbanus and DOMITIANUS...
    D9CFCDB9-FDA3-4454-BC19-1F21FFF9182A.jpeg

    In the (unreliable ?) Historia Augustae, a DOMITIANUS is presented as a general of Aureolus involved in the suppression of the revolt of Macrianus in 261 AD.

    B68EA336-848B-4377-8718-F3112F21048B.jpeg

    One year after de discovery, an article was published about the mysterious coin in the Revue Numismatique of 1901, but only illustrated with a simple line drawing of the antoniniani.

    DAF6E788-8E21-4A2B-ABF7-3CB8678D35A8.jpeg

    Thirty years later, a photography of a plaster casr of the coin was shown in the same publication.

    3DEDFF48-D9C0-473B-BEC8-D209A97F33F8.jpeg

    It was enough for P.H.Webb to add it in the RIC volume 2 in 1933. Meanwhile, the famous DOMITIANUS amazingly disappeared from the museum of Nantes. During the next decades, the authenticity of the coin was debated by many specialist. Those who concluded that it was probably a fake made many hypothesis :

    • It was an altered or tooled genuine coin of this period, probably of Tetricus
    • It is an authentic coin but struck from modified dies of Victorinus
    • It was simply a modern conterfeit of a made up emperor
    G.Elmer didn’t include it in his reference book in 1942 and L.Laffranchi condemned the coin the same year. Even in 1992, L.Okamura published a paper concluding that the DOMITIANUS was possibly a fake. But surprise! In 2003 the French coin was rediscovered in the Nantes collection. While specialist were examining the only specimen that no eyes on earth has ever seen, an extraordinary discovery was made 350 miles north in England.
    3EC58FEF-89EA-4FD4-8E44-46F39ACBE735.jpeg
    The British coin.
    April 4th 2003.
    David Malin, a young Englishman and amateur metal detectorist, with the help of his sister Carol, unearthed in Chalgrove Oxfordshire a pot full of Roman coins. Buried about 18 inches below the surface it was his second big discovery, after finding a similar size hoard in 1989. The 2 treasures were excavated only 100 feet from each other. In this lot was identified a second copy of the DOMITIANUS, fused with 5000 other coins. Comparaison between the French and the British specimen shows that they were struck from the same pair of dies !

    9668FE8E-534C-4B84-9583-E55F64FAFC39.jpeg
    The Chalgrove hoard :

    D60BFCFF-F5FE-4878-B964-CC0B580C4DAC.jpeg

    The coin was qualified of « one of the most interesting Roman objects ever found in Britain. » Finally there were no doubts at all .Even if nobody knows his full name, DOMITIANUS did exist and he was an emperor ( or at least an usurper emperor) !
    IMP C DOMITIANUS PF AVG
    CONCORDIA MILITUM
    Concordia standing left, holding patera & cornucopiae
    2.07 g
    BFBB00AC-AA73-46A9-A174-964E039DE6AF.jpeg

    It appears that he grabbed power between the death of Victorinus and the accession of Tetricus in 271 AD. It also seems that he ruled for a very short time, maybe only few days. So the reason of his death ( attempting a ´coup d’état’ and minting his own coinage ) is also the reason why he access immortality in history....So that’s the story, and like somebody once said, it could have been the plot of a bestseller. But a big question remains: what else as yet to be found ???

    Bibliography.
    S.Estiot. L’usurpateur Domitianus
    P.H.Webb. RIC vol.2 p.578, 590 ( 1933)
    H.Carnoy. Dict.biographique
    A.de la Fuye. Revue num.1901
    A.Benenson. Archeology archive 2005

    edited for spelling by request
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 3, 2019
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. galba68

    galba68 Well-Known Member

    Very interesting..Nice post..
     
  4. zumbly

    zumbly Ha'ina 'ia mai ana ka puana

    Nice writeup! That's one Gallic usurper I will not be collecting any time soon... :D
     
    Classickidcoins likes this.
  5. Marsyas Mike

    Marsyas Mike Well-Known Member

    Very interesting and well-written write-up.
     
  6. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    Amazing!
     
  7. BenSi

    BenSi Well-Known Member

    Great story , thank you for sharing!
     
  8. ancient coin hunter

    ancient coin hunter 3rd Century Usurper

    So he's the Gallic Empire's Domitianus - not the usurper in Egypt.
     
  9. thejewk

    thejewk Well-Known Member

    Great post, thanks.
     
  10. Cucumbor

    Cucumbor Well-Known Member

    Now I'm dreaming of finding a terracota full of coins in my garden............ :joyful:

    Q
     
    Alegandron and Classickidcoins like this.
  11. PlanoSteve

    PlanoSteve Well-Known Member

    That's a nice little gem of a story, thanks! :happy::happy::happy:
     
  12. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    Nice writeup thanks.
     
  13. Ocatarinetabellatchitchix

    Ocatarinetabellatchitchix Well-Known Member

    I appreciate the nice comments. Erratum: Mr.Doug Smith just made me notice that the usurper in 261 was Macrianus and not Macrinus. My translation from latin to french to english need some improvement.
    Mea culpa...
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  14. Robidoux Pass

    Robidoux Pass Well-Known Member

    Great story. Thanks for sharing.
     
  15. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    I know Supporters have a longer window of time that allows editing errors but how long do regular members have? Can a moderator make such an edit for someone who timed out.
     
  16. I would love to go and do some detecting around Europe at some point.
     
  17. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    To the best of my knowledge all members, including Supporters, have about 1 hr during which they can edit their post.

    Yes, and they will gladly do so if you ask them to, but if you do please tell them exactly what you want to edit and how you want it to read.

    There is another option as well. Any member can ask any mod to be able to edit one of his post by himself. And if they do ask to do that, the mod can click on a few buttons and allow you to do that. In other words he can give you a day or two to do what editing you wish to do. But again, you will need to tell the mod exactly how you intend to edit your post.

    That last sentence is important in both cases because they are some things that a mod will not allow you to do. For example, doing any editing that would break the forum rules will obviously not be allowed. But as long as the editing you wish to make is within reason then your request will almost always be granted. But it must be understood, there are no blank checks written. Meaning no one will ever be given an unlimited amount of time to edit any post.

    So how does one go about making this request for a editing extension ? Two basic ways, you can send a mod a PM explaining what you want to do, or two you can use the report button, and again explain what you want to do. Using the Report button allows any and all mods to see your message so that the 1st one to come along can assist you. Using a PM of course means you'll have to wait until that specific mod reads your message.

    As an FYI, all of this kind of stuff, and a whole lot more, is posted about and explained in the Support and Feedback section of the forum, which anyone can access at any time to look things up. Once in the S & F section you can use the Search function, or simply browse the thread titles as they will usually lead you to your answer.
     
  18. Ocatarinetabellatchitchix

    Ocatarinetabellatchitchix Well-Known Member

    Sorry to bring back this old boring thread, but I discovered by chance the existence of a third specimen ! In 2006, with the help of the Ministry of the Interior, the fund of the National History Museum of Sofia received an extremely rare Roman copper coin from the second half of the third century. It was found by treasure hunters with the help of metal detectors in one of the numerous Roman sites in Northwestern Bulgaria (it is quite possible, for example, that it originated from the ancient city of Raciaria, whose ruins are currently under constant and unpunished excavation and looting by various "treasure hunter teams”).

    Description:

    • Obverse: DOMITIAN...... AVG. Bust of Domitian, wearing beard and moustaches, right

    • Reverse: LAET...... AVG. Laetitia standing left, holding wreath in right hand, unclear object in left hand. Alter with fire below, left.

    Copper. Half worn and slightly corroded example. Diameter 16–18 mm; weight 1.53 g


    The museum just sent me the article from their annual reports, published in 2010. You can see the picture inside. Unfortunately the picture is b&w and with low resolution. They will try to find from their numismatic colleagues a better one. I'm looking forward to see it, because it will be easier to determine if we are in the presence of a new type for this "Emperor".

    FC60D5A9-87F1-4583-98C6-6B826D2C0922.jpeg
     
  19. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    A Bulgarian find seems suspicious to me. Bulgaria is currently a den of forgery, and it isn't anywhere near the erstwhile boundaries of the Gallic Empire. That's not to say the coin couldn't have traveled, but it would have been a bit more reassuring if it had been found in France or the UK. The picture doesn"t help the matter.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page