Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;raider34, post: 1595470, member: 16402&quot;]I think a 65+ is within reason. Looks like there&#039;s a fair sized hit on the cheek (right in that purple/blue area), but that&#039;s about it. Fields are pretty clean too. And the strike is about average for a &#039;04-O. The break in toning on the upper cheek wont have any effect on the technical grade. I think the big thing to take into account is the toning. Quoting PCGS &quot;Amazing eye appeal can add up to a full point to the &#039;technical&#039; grade&quot; and &quot;Positive eye appeal can add up to a half-point to the &#039;technical&#039; grade&quot;. <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/eyeappeal.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/eyeappeal.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/eyeappeal.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>My guess is PCGS considered the eye appeal to be &quot;Positive&quot; at the very least. So without the toning it might be 64/65, but with it, it&#039;s in the 65/66 range.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in