Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;raider34, post: 1595177, member: 16402&quot;]<img src="http://images.pcgs.com/CoinFacts/26362018_large.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p>The PCGS pics: <a href="http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/26362018/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/26362018/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/26362018/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Imo the PCGS pics are more realistic than the Teletrade ones. The TT pics look a lot more wild and unnatural. I think the toning&#039;s attractive, but I wouldn&#039;t have paid that much for the coin (I can see why someone did though). The later date Morgans usually are harder to find with monster toning. The &#039;04-O is a bit of an exception though, a good number were found in the &#039;60s Treasury release and original mint-bag toning isn&#039;t uncommon. Not to say monster toning is as common on the &#039;04-O as it is on an early S mint coin, but it&#039;s certainly more common than most late dates. In the case of this coin though the toning is pretty extreme for the date so the high premium isn&#039;t that surprising.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in