Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
$100 toning premium on this coin.
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Juan Blanco, post: 1609108, member: 41665"]I agree with Tinpot on this very important point (and likewise plead TOTAL ignorance on aethetic valuation.) But I am fascinated by this coin market niche. </p><p><br /></p><p>Detecto's comment "All I know is, that I've seen toned coins bring more, every year" rings somewhat true but I'd qualify it: the 'toned coin mkt' SEEMS to have held up better than other segments - compare VAMs! - but maybe that's more an (over-)emphasis on 'monster-toned' (best) examples? </p><p><br /></p><p>For the inexperienced just peeking at prices, it would be easy to blur a) slight decline overall in aggregate value with b) significant price incease in monsters. Then again, I look at everything by-the-numbers, because number don't lie. otoh, collectors/dealers often do.</p><p><br /></p><p>For example, collectors here REFUSE to admit that Norfed premiums have collapsed. The delusion of so-called numismatists on something as straight-forward as PRICE is especially alarming, for real prices are $ signs, market facts. ENOUGH of the goofy Beanie-Baby make-believe! 'Hard Money' people really <u>should</u> get it - it's worth what it's worth. And YES, we should all learn something from that debacle. </p><p><br /></p><p>Suppose the VAM market has tanked too, for different reasons. Coins that were ~4x-6x Over Intrinsic (POS) in 2005 went parabolic, 27x Intrinsic in 2007; by 2011 & in 2012 the same VAMs had fallen back to ~2x Instrinsic :<a href="http://www.cointalk.com/t216533/#post1561944" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.cointalk.com/t216533/#post1561944">http://www.cointalk.com/t216533/#post1561944</a> </p><p><br /></p><p>Why presume toned coin collectors to be any more honest with their valuations? Take everything with a grain of salt. I'm inclined to see aesthetics/eye appeal as the most valid justification for paying a hefty premium. But I know that fads are fickle, tie-dyes go in and out of fashion too. <i>Whether or not</i> a 'Bubble' forms and/or pops can ONLY be confirmed from price data. I haven't seen any studies on different segments of the toned coin mkt, with explicit histories. Any links, please?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Juan Blanco, post: 1609108, member: 41665"]I agree with Tinpot on this very important point (and likewise plead TOTAL ignorance on aethetic valuation.) But I am fascinated by this coin market niche. Detecto's comment "All I know is, that I've seen toned coins bring more, every year" rings somewhat true but I'd qualify it: the 'toned coin mkt' SEEMS to have held up better than other segments - compare VAMs! - but maybe that's more an (over-)emphasis on 'monster-toned' (best) examples? For the inexperienced just peeking at prices, it would be easy to blur a) slight decline overall in aggregate value with b) significant price incease in monsters. Then again, I look at everything by-the-numbers, because number don't lie. otoh, collectors/dealers often do. For example, collectors here REFUSE to admit that Norfed premiums have collapsed. The delusion of so-called numismatists on something as straight-forward as PRICE is especially alarming, for real prices are $ signs, market facts. ENOUGH of the goofy Beanie-Baby make-believe! 'Hard Money' people really [U]should[/U] get it - it's worth what it's worth. And YES, we should all learn something from that debacle. Suppose the VAM market has tanked too, for different reasons. Coins that were ~4x-6x Over Intrinsic (POS) in 2005 went parabolic, 27x Intrinsic in 2007; by 2011 & in 2012 the same VAMs had fallen back to ~2x Instrinsic :[URL]http://www.cointalk.com/t216533/#post1561944[/URL] Why presume toned coin collectors to be any more honest with their valuations? Take everything with a grain of salt. I'm inclined to see aesthetics/eye appeal as the most valid justification for paying a hefty premium. But I know that fads are fickle, tie-dyes go in and out of fashion too. [I]Whether or not[/I] a 'Bubble' forms and/or pops can ONLY be confirmed from price data. I haven't seen any studies on different segments of the toned coin mkt, with explicit histories. Any links, please?[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
$100 toning premium on this coin.
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...