No, but I'll be helping Miz get the contest started, so let's not get ahead of ourselves. All questions will be answered when the contest gets underway. Chris
mizozuman2, I was actually responding to the following words: "lol, no me and cpm9ball are pretty sure we know what it is going to be". Here is a quick example representing the provenance of my general fundament: (A conversation between two individuals.) --"do you suffer from some natural inconvenience?" -"yes" --"through medium of 'sensations', seconds prior to having asked you the anterior question, I recognized that you were suffering from some natural inconvenience" -"then...why do you consult it?" --"no...because I, 'too', suffer from some natural inconvenience...but my anterior words do not opaque that, excluding that any end can be altered, your consultation isn't valid. With my question, I was proving if my ratiocination still had natural potential to appropriately displace itself. Including that everything within our principal dimension can be known beforehand, I comment that time is a valid concept." In my above example, there are various natural and logical inconveniences; however, the individual who locked first was practically obliged to leave the conversation with sufficient angle for a counterattack. Though, is quite clear that he never washed his hands. If you're interested, I can send you a private message specifying how the apparent receiver may adequately close the possible dispute with the difference on his side.
It sounds to me like you need a big dose of Ex-Lax, but be sure to put a few coin books in the bathroom beforehand. Chris:devil: