Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;FrizzyAntoine, post: 5233353, member: 114961&quot;]Interesting list, thanks for sharing! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I would only personally consider 1, 8, 10, and to a lesser extent 3 (which isn&#039;t showing up for some reason) to be important. The others are very expensive coins, but not very important IMO. </p><p><br /></p><p>I feel a Peloponnesian War-era Athens tetradrachm should have been 2, instead of the decadrachm, as its a much more historically significant and influential type. Other contenders in my mind are Alexander tetradrachms and gold staters of Philip II, as well as the first series of Roma+Dioscuri Denarii, and let&#039;s not forget the Achaemenid Sigloi+Daric combo which was the first truly &#039;global&#039; and standardised bimetallic currency system.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in