Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CrustyCoins, post: 655349, member: 19115&quot;]I think the difference here is if they would have filed for a forfeiture hearing to begin with the government would have been legal holding on to them but since they did not the Judge rulled it illegal and gave them until September to file a forfeiture hearing in which case the gov. would be in the right holding on to them until the hearing is over. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If the government would have done things right to begin with the Langbords would be out of luck as they may have been able to put the burden of proof on them but now most likely in this hearing the burden of proof will be on the government and because of this I think they are likely to settle. </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Can&#039;t wait until the hearing to see what happens.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in