Damn this moved fast. At least im able to get at least ONE trade dollar in [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Wish I'd been able to do 92. Have a killer ms 66 25c but I'll happily do 91 instead
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Not original skin but a nice early half. A few years in a paper envelope might help it a lot. The walker a lot scarcer than people think too
Pretty coin
Lost a lot of images when I switched phones. Plus I own very little that's 20th c and basically nothing that's post ww2 so now we're getting...
Nice to see mintmarked classic head gold. So rare and underappreciated
My first post on a thread I started lol [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Looks like a nice score on a rare trade $1
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I gotta get my pics fixed on th I s new phone. Missed too many
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Here's a quarter. Doubt I can call anyone who cares though [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yeah what I expected. I thought real. I have no doubt now. Not a date a fake. Contemporary or modern would be that good of. 74-s would likely...
Wear polish and debris. One almost looks cudlike probably from debris bilidup. The letters are thin anyway i could easily see junk or grease in...
My honest call was almost a 61 with a color bump. But there's a lot of bagmarks but nothing completely horrific like I see on 60-1 Morgans
Baggy but pretty. 62 not a date I see a lot of toners of
I think it'd absolutely real. I will second the old cleaning. A common date. Especially chopped. As a lot of the type 1 trades were shipped...
Separate names with a comma.
