That would depend on the owner.
I guess I'm living in the past...These used to be 65s at best, and hundreds less, but quantities are shrinking, and there's only so many to be had...
I,ve had a couple 1883-CCs which would dwarf ...but few in 65 territories ...I used to think CCs were over valued... i WAS WRONG Me too!
Shizzam! I used to think that things that looked nice were nice, but maybe not.
Beat me with a stick! She looks like she got hit really hard in the eye...Poor girl!
Looks like PCGS gave it a 66...a fair grade, but I still think 64+ is my limit.
I give her a 64+, but who knows?
The aftermath of a very bad joke.
I'm in agreement with 65 or better...maybe it's undergraded because of it's common date. Would grade higher today...I was just looking at one...
The Mint used new production methods in 05....It's diff. to tell circulation strikes from the satin mint sets....very confusing!!!
That is absolutely fantastic!
I lay out a satin cloth, then handle the coin with a clean credit card...maybe a bit over the top, but that helps eliminate rim stains especially...
Always remember...high prices are an aftermath of inflation...there is no real gain in wealth.
Please stop handling coppers!!!
Gathering alum. cans on Arizona roads can net you thousands!
There was a whole string of gambling ships which stretched from Long Beach to the south, one of which was the "Monte Carlo" which sank on New...
If it weren't for the head gash it would be a 67
66...looks nicer but these are mostly graded more conservatively than other dates.
Don't cross your chickens before your bridges are hatched...the economy can flip just as fast as it flopped.
Me too!
Separate names with a comma.
