Definitely a lamination.
It's a die chip. Not worth having an expert look at it.
Looks like artificial toning. Color is just "off."
Definitely under graded. Should certify at CAC with the excellent toning.
Looks real, but cleaned. Most counterfeit trade dollars have mushy details, usually the date or denticles.
It appears to be legitimate.
That's because the coin is slightly rotated in the photo. It's circulation damage. Spend it.
It's a plating blister. Not considered an error due to the vast amount of coins that have it. That looks like a clipped planchet just below the date.
They are both WAMs.
I don't see a die crack or a split planchet. Both should be easily visible.
Not a doubled die.
Congrats! :) Pictures please!
After reading this thread and posting once, I’ve had enough. The OP refuses to speak civilly to the members here, and seems to only want to hear...
Badgers better be mammals, or I'll be going crazy now.:wacky: Badger - 1936 Wisconsin half dollar
I can't believe I forgot! :banghead:
Bald Eagle - Morgan dollar.
@Ezy, just wanted to explain why this isn't a mint error. If it was a real mint error, it would look much different. The planchet would possibly...
Beautiful! :)
Definitely not a D. Normally, the D is very readable at even FR-2 grade.
Nice purchases! :)
Separate names with a comma.
