MS-64RB
VF-30
Definitely a bait and switch. The coins in the listing photos are clearly not the same coin as the coins you received. Hope you get your money back.
Appears to be a small area of PVC damage.
AU-58
It is Post Mint Damage. Not a mint error.
I voted the same I did on CU Forums. AU-55. Just a bit too much wear for a 58.
1. AU-58 2. AU-58 3. MS-60 Details, Artificial Toning (might straight grade at MS-65) 4. MS-65 5. AU-53 6. MS-66RD
MS-64
I live in Indiana, so not too far from the race. :)
MS-65FS
AU-53
1. MS-64 2. MS-66 3. MS-65
Thanks. I changed my vote.
I already voted for VF Details, cleaned. Since it's not in a details holder though, I change my grade to VF-30.
F-12 seems to be accurate in my opinion.
Both those coins are genuine. Yes, a lot of the earlier coinage (Flowing Hair, Draped Bust, Capped Bust) appears to have made more crudely than...
MS-63PL
I agree with Conder101 and C-B-D. Appears to be a planchet flaw, not a lamination.
Separate names with a comma.