I agree that too much importance is placed on a plastic holder with a number on it. I wonder why people feel that having a (often low value common...
Congrats on your hard work to get the new VAMWorld site up and running. [IMG]
Yep, PMD (post mint damage) not an error.
Yep, it's a lam. Wow - nice catch :) :D
The doubling on EPU is Machine Doubling, not a doubled die. Welcome to CoinTalk!
The IHC I felt had questionable color. But the Lincoln looked fine to me - I'd have given it a 65 or 66!
MS-66
MS-66FS
Zincolns weren't made until 1982. ;) Just some PMD. (well-placed hit from circulation)
Nice coin! I like the late die state - all those die chips and cracks. Definitely a quite low amount of ED than most available examples.
Nope, not a high relief.
Please don't waste your money and send the coin to be graded. The doubling you see on the date is Machine Doubling, not a doubled die. Machine...
Welcome to CoinTalk. Another Hoosier here. ;) I don't see any errors on the coin you posted. Looks pretty normal to me.
The filled D is due to a broken die post. Common on these cents. The T and 1 being flattened is due to circulation wear and tear...not a mint error.
A bit late to this thread, but yes, it was in one of those "lucky penny" holders. One way I look at coins I think might exhibit a mint error is...
100% fake. :D
AU-53. To be honest, not a fan of the cleaning/retoning. I like the die cracks on the reverse though.
Looks accurately graded to me.
MS-65
Morgan Dollar "addict" here. :D
Separate names with a comma.
