No. Unless you know exactly what you are doing, the most I'd do is soak the coin in 100% acetone (available at hardware stores/Dollar General/etc.)
Wow. Just wow.
Yep, a poorly made fake.
Looks to be AU, but cleaned/altered surfaces IMO.
MS-65, considering this is a newer ANACS holder.
Thanks again @Insider for the suggestions. :)
I am not a huge fan of this coin....I'd want better pics of it before spending anything on it. As physics-fan mentioned, the toning is odd....
Thanks! I will edit it now.
I just saw this thread...I think y'all would probably get tired of looking at my Morgans, but I'll post a few pics of the best ones I have here...
DMG - Damage. :p
Can we just stop the drama here and move on? :banghead:
@Insider Thanks for the input. For some reason, however, I can't edit it - I think I've gone over the time limit on editing. If the Mods/staff...
Yes, all comments/suggestions are welcome. :)
Pictures please!
Edited the article to include that info. Thanks.
@baseball21 What does dipping usually do? Will edit the post with the corrected info.
Honestly, I feel the grade is justified. The one problem is that none of us have seen the coin in hand and decided whether we feel it's accurately...
I wrote this on another forum, but decided to post it here to help some folks who might have questions about this. I decided to create a write-up...
Since I'm guessing the PCGS grades, (and not giving my actual grade opinion :p) 1917 Type I - MS-62 1917-S Type I - MS-62 1917-S Type II - MS-64
:D ;)
Separate names with a comma.
