+2
Yep, clearly a counterfeit.
MS-64PL, possibly DMPL. MS-65
it is now a debate whether these doubled eye lids are real DDs or not. I personally am not 100% sure.
@MeowtheKitty I see you are doing the same thing here are you did earlier on the other forum...the third person talk has become annoying now. No...
Close up pics are needed.
I'd keep it the way it is.
I agree...post minting damage from circulation. Not a mint error.
Looks like it was sanded/ground down...not a mint error.
Post minting damage...not an error. Welcome to CT.
@RachelRuth We'll need some better pictures.
It can be difficult to attribute a VAM on such a worn coin. I would try to see if it's one of the obvious varieties, if not then I wouldn't try...
Large date for sure.
AU-50
I agree... All business strikes.
Welcome to CT. Damaged coin, not a mint error.
The reverse looks normal to me except for that the coin is bent. Can you point out where you see the lamination?
Nice Morgan, do you have a question in particular about this coin?
Pardon my intrusion. :D Looks like a misaligned die on the obverse. (MAD)
Doesn't look like a real Clipped Planchet to me...the clip is the wrong shape.
Separate names with a comma.