Nowhere in what was written did I see anyone say all doubling other than Ddo-001 was MD or ddd. You need to read the posts more carefully.
Wouldn't wide am cents be varieties instead of errors?
Md for sure!
It's MD. It's also not worth having graded.
Definitely feeder finger scrapes. Also the subject of die trails has been solved. They are actually caused by mint workers using wire brushes or...
What jeffb said. I see the rectangle also.
Looks like a lamination error to me also.
MD. The doctor is in!
Don't take those videos too seriously.
I personally think the best way to describe it is "unintentionally damaged die".
I'm glad someone's having fun. I think it's a bunch of nothing thought up under a bridge!
I swear to you, over half the 69 cents I find have floating roofs!
The only one tripping is you. Now you're just making insults at other members as if you know more about numismatics than everyone else. Pay the...
Don't let it evaporate. Soak then rinse with distilled water. Always the last step.
Yep.
It's a large date.
He's already posting it on another site trying to push it as an error.
Sorry, but I'm not seeing doubling of any kind.
They're really not different per se, just figure in different dies, die state for example.
My bad. A few days ago a member was telling us they had the 97 doubled ear and when told no she said that unless we were those people then she...
Separate names with a comma.