I'm still not sure how I feel about the whole thing. The plus designation will also be available at NGC in about 60 days (NGC to use plus...
Congrats Rickie, that's a beautiful note!
Well I guess they got married in either Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont or Washington D.C, because those are two ladies,...
GoldCoinLover had a pretty good thread on them too: Understanding Counterfeit Detection.
Don't look now Borgovan but it's back, and another year older.
[IMG]
Awesome! I'll bump the new goal up to $3000, but were going to have to get a new thermometer, because we blew the lid off the last one :D. [IMG]
Lol, I'm here. The toning looks AT, especially on the obverse, nothing looks right about it. I would say it has AU details. As for what you...
It's hard to say without seeing pics. I haven't heard about any '92-CC being specially engraved by the mint, so it was most likely done post mint,...
I've only seen it done by NGC for strong reverse toned coins. I'm not sure if NGC does it automatically, or if it can be requested by the...
I think he means there is no value listed on it. Just a guess, but is this it? Rutherford B Hayes Official Bronze Medal
It's the name of the variety (Ugly Head Copper: Introduction). Lol, apparently collectors didn't like the obverse design too much.
I don't see any doubling from the pics. Is the 6 in the date opened (The knob of the 6 would be clearly separated from the lower loop)? I'm not...
I don't believe it's VAM 20. It doesn't look like doubling under the date of your coin, it looks like the "shadow effect", which is the lack of...
No problem :thumb:.
The luster looks good, but it's hard to tell if there is any light wear from the pics. If you can, post larger pics. CT will auto-shrink your...
The marks on the top coin are die clashes, technically it's not considered an error, and they will not effect the grade. On the second coin the...
Nice pics Jello. The coin is definitely the rounded O, Centered and Upright, and it looks like VAM 14 to me (1888-O VAM-14).
U.S. Mint Online Product Catalog
Well if it does turn out to be a proof and not a PL or DMPL (And the 1884-O is one of the more common PL and DMPL dates), I believe it will be...
Separate names with a comma.
