I do not think I could find the thread again, but the info came from Lincoln Cent Forum. The pictures came from Heritage and I put it together....
Looks like I did not insult it enough. It was hard to see the wear through all the toning.
Sorry, but there are 5; [ATTACH]
MS62. Too many nicks!
It is not a die crack. What I am seeing is incuse and a die crack is and can only be raised. I strongly suspect there is some zinc rot...
Cleaned and polished and likely heated. Not normal, but one of the better looking for the wrong reasons.
Very, VERY minor distraction in the field. I am not sure any one thing kept it at 66. There are just a couple nicks, a couple tiny darker areas,...
In this case, eBay took it down to protect the buyers.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It is against eBay's rules if nothing else; Policy overview To help ensure buyer confidence in the stamps, currency, and coins listed on eBay,...
Is it just me or is that number invalid?
2 examples of the same coin; [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
IMO, it is absolutely the same one. The differences come from the 2 angles on the shot and entirely different lighting.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
But you only posted 5 pictures. And, yes, it is of no value beyond 2.5¢ (or so) copper.
Errors are not my field, but from what I can interpolate from those pictures, it only looks like glue and corrosion. I do not think there is a...
Large date. The 9 does not point at the 0 See http://lincolncentresource.com/smalldates/1970Ssmalldate.html
AU53
OK, but that depends on its generation. It could be anything from 55 to 66.
AU55
Separate names with a comma.