65PL 65
I can't read the luster from those pictures. Somewhere between 64 and 67. I would tend to the low side as a guess.
Plating blisters probably turning to zinc rot.
But they feel much safer using their bare hands. "respect and courtesy" aside, when they're handling $1,000,000 coins, they absolutely do not...
I do not think it is a die clash, but a die scratch. It does appear to be raised.
64
You might want to watch this video; https://www.cointalk.com/threads/cool-video-showing-the-ngc-grading-process-at-anaheim.282761/
Your lighting is from about 12:00. The far side from the lighting is the bright side for at least 3. Those, at least, are not raised, but incuse.
Sorry, but I am 99% sure those are incuse. That means they are nicks, or scratches if you prefer, on the coin. Scratches on the die are raised...
Minimum 65 but likely 66. That looks like an old NNC slab. If so, you got lucky!
#1 on my list would be alloy - i,e, wood grain. BTW, you will also notice that the lines are exactly parallel on both sides. I mean both the...
Those lines are definitely from the planchet. I cannot tell for sure if it is alloy from the pictures, but it is 100% from the planchet....
I would be extremely surprised if you could get a fingerprint in the depths of a coin without touching the neighboring devises. Even if you could...
I think it has a shot at 64 were it not for the reverse (inside the left wheat). If that is as flat as it looks, a 62 would not surprise me.
63
58
vf35
From you "agreement"; BTW, I would vote in you favor, but my guess is eBay's lawyers would win eventually.
It has been bullion for some time.
Separate names with a comma.
