The picture is too out of focus to tell much of anything and we need to see both sides of the coin.
I thought they were one and the same!
So you have no proof there are 4? And you have no article from Numismatic News?
Been done this road before and I am not going again. You can satisfy your own requirements. Aside from that, #3 and #4 are noticeably different...
Bingo!
Yep!
You are going to have to be a bit more specific. A search of Numismatic News and Google fail to reveal any such item.
I am going to take a shot - 66 DMPL
Perhaps you should post it here. That way someone might believe you.
My previous post was Cascade's likes. Yours and mine are essentially identical. I have 2985 and you have 2957.
4126 as of now. It is on your info or whatever it is called when you click on your avatar.
I am getting closer. I won't bother to total the coins minted from 1933 to 1979, but the Denver mint used a single punch for all those mint...
I guess your sources are not coming through, but I just found this; "1914-D cents were coined from at least six different dies, so the position...
That is about 760,000,000 cents for San Francisco from 1917 to 1941 or about 1400 dies (or less). Assuming that was half their production (I...
Doh! But it is shiny on all angle of the surface. HUH? What are die radials?
Actually, yes it was. I cannot find anything specific to the Denver mint. but the San Francisco mint had a total of 9 punches during its entire...
If I am reading Mike's response correctly, the "grain" is the result of milling the blank rolls. I don't see any scratches except outside the...
If that is a rub on the chin, don't bother. Otherwise, 64/40 for a 67.
Sorry, but Mike is right. The same punch.
For coins like that, most any seller - but absolutely SLABBED. PERIOD.
Separate names with a comma.