The 1984 Cent is damaged and/or has a 'glue-ish' material on his head. Not an error. The 2000 Cent looks normal - the Mint probably strengthened...
If you're talking about the area below the "836" in the photos, it's not a die crack. It appears to be a 'struck thru' error - a random piece of...
There is absolutely nothing any of us can contribute to your post without a photo of the entire obverse, and a decent close up of the area(s)...
That's 'damage' - contact marks and hits from it being in circulation. Not an error of any type, I'm sorry to say....
PMD
Not an error, and not underweight out of the Mint.
Nothing different about it except where it's been in the past 50 years. copper cents can turn into different colors depending on numerous...
Del, glad you came here, and found the info you were looking for!
C-C - good line. I agree - OP, please tell us what you see as an error or errors on the cent.
GT Glue Too
Although I started a few years earlier than you, I was 13 when I got 'serious' about coins, and errors......its a great hobby, and you'll learn...
Nice find - it's one of the three or four State Quarters with Cuds in the 3:00, 4:00, or 8:00 position - They almost all look the same in size...
aka 'Sandwhich'
They're all de-plated, and damaged to boot.... (the ones' posted)
Looks like a corroded ragged end clip. The Blakesley Effect shows opposite. Shame it's also corroded.
The rim just doesn't look like the other one's pictured ..... Not saying it's NOT, just saying I'm not certain, from the photos only.
Joe, based on the photo, I'm not certain it's a US Half Dollar planchet.
The die clash at the date is from the Memorial building roof.
You're confusing this story with a 1943 Copper Cent. 1964 Cents are struck on copper planchets.......they're not errors
It's a damaged cent, not a double strike or a partial blockage. Another coin was simply pressed into this coin at 6:00 on the reverse. See the...
Separate names with a comma.
