Yes, environmental damage to the surfaces, after the coin was released into circulation.
The 'pits' you're showing in the photos are contact marks from another coin - aka 'bag marks' from it being mixed in a large bag of newly minted...
Yep, a LARGE curved clip
Damaged rims - not any kind of error on the coin....sorry
Sorry I didn't answer your question about how to tell the difference: If it's bright and shiny, it's been re-plated If it's dark, dull, and...
It's been de-plated Not an error, sorry
Looks NG to me
Based on the photos, there's contact marks in those two areas.
Yep, they are die cracks and die chips. Good eye !
The copper plating is 'splitting' off the surface of the planchet, as it's struck. On your cent, it's part of mechanical doubling, in my view....
Rim damaged (PMD) and struck from a worn or overused die. Not an error, sorry.
Die chips aren't Cuds.
It's been in circulation - so it's sometimes called an Impaired Proof.
Just saw this thread. It's struck on a Mis-Annealed Planchet.
Wow - it certainly is!
Contact marks, and enviormentally damaged surfaces. Not an error of any kind.....sorr
Great coin, and a date/mm you don't see very often. Worth about 10++ times a common date, imo.
...nothing to add to the above numerous observations.
Damaged on the MM
That's solder - might have been in a bezel Not an error
Separate names with a comma.
