I doubt that significantly affected the grade, but there is a reason I don't work for PCGS. FWIW, I believe that is not postmint.
Yep!
Let's see what the expert says. Opinion @mikediamond ?
I am not sure what grading system they used, but there is no way that is a 62 in my systems.
pf66
Including 1909-S VDB:blackeye::banghead: 001; 1909-S VDB:blackeye::banghead: 002; 1909-S VDB:blackeye::banghead: 003; and 1909-S...
I would suggest that you go back to the OP's images and reread the labels.
I do not think it will affect your drawings, but looking at you MM, the two ends are supposed to be parallel. Here is a close up of the MM...
Not sure if this will help, but these are the 4 S VDB dies. BTW, be sure to read the note for this picture's die #1. [ATTACH]
64
That one is authentic, but that company is noted for cracking problem coins and selling them as problem free. Seriously, look into a certified...
It is the insert gasket. I have seen that on several mostly earlier slabs.
Believe it or not, I can pick out the early die markers and something above GOD. Or at least I think I can.
I agree that the "rim anomaly" is the slab and not the coin. MS65
Here are the diagnostics I had, but it seems all the pictures have expired....
That is funny. The mint calls them nickels. They mint nickels. It they are not what we get, just where do the nickels go? [ATTACH]...
I don't see anything that says it is fake, but there is a lot I cannot see clear enough to authenticate. The MM appears to be in the right place...
Been there, done that, got the tee shirt. Only I used 600+. BTW, depending on when you looked, people such as Irish2Ic, and ldhair were the champ.
65 pl
If it is AU, it greysheets for $55.00. From those pictures, you may be right about AU, but my guess is MS. I would guess 63 but 64 is possible.
Separate names with a comma.
