Without photos, it's probably the common effect known as mechanical or ejection doubling.
I see some extended 'darker' areas coming off two parts of the crown. But, based on your photos, they don't look like die chips - better,...
Chris, I do the same thing too sometimes - I'll reply to a post without -really- spending the time to see everything that's on a photo.
I didn't see them, so I didn't comment. Where are they?
On your next coin, please start by telling us what you see as the error on the coin.
It looks plated, and the plating can cause the digits and letters to appear to be doubled. They are not doubled.
The 'Cent' design elements are not incused or backwards. The Dime was struck with fake Cent Dies.
The 'cent' strike is from fake dies. Not a double strike/double denomination. It's an altered coin - it did not leave the US Mint like that.
P & G got it -
As mentioned above, all three dimes in the new post are damaged, and are not errors of any kind......sorry
look underneath the P, in the field right below it. The surface appears to be 'disturbed' there. It appears the extra metal came from that area...
Your photos are still a bit dark, but it seems that NGC got it right.
Nice die crack - I haven't seen that one (that date)before
I see damage at the bottom of the P, and what looks like a light 'void' under the crossbar of the P - (gotta look carefully to see the difference...
Sorry, didn't mean to say 'dark' photos, I mean those photos of it in the NGC holder.
can't tell from the dark photos, sorry
The 'rest' of the coin IS damaged - the surfaces
It's a flip-over double strike
Placing one of the same against the clip area does not authenticate the clip. You need the three authentication points, or at least 1 definitive...
It's damaged surfaces, also called as a general category: Environmental Damage. It is not an error of any kind, I'm sorry to say
Separate names with a comma.
