Based on the photos, I see a circulation toned coin struck from worn or overused dies. Nothing says 'error' that I can see, at all.......
Mornin' - I posted my first comment after the OP's first post, and went away for the weekend. Four pages of what I thought would occur. I told...
Hi - glad you took my suggestion to post it here. I'll let others reply with info on your 43-S Steel Cent.
Probably Yes
Just a 'hit' aka: contact mark, simply from being in circulation.... Not an error. I bet the surface of the coin has other contact marks too.
Someone punched something into the quarter. It's damaged, and not an error of any kind or type....sorry
There's nothing wrong with any of them. They're very spendable, however.
+4
As above, only the '48 cent is laminated. The rest are damaged.
Nice struck thru but not worth the submission fees/postage, etc., imo
$100,000 $150,000 (different coins)
PMD - it did not happen at the Mint Damaged/sliced rim
PMD No doubt whatsoever
If you've found two or more, I'd take a guess (from the one photo only) that it might be Feeder Finger Damage. More photos are needed.
That wouldn't be considered an improper metal mixture, imo.
The RT die chip is known for that date. They're tougher to find than the later-date BIE die chips, and more interesting, imo. I believe the...
Not an error or die variety. SCW Simply Circulation Wear
OK, thanks for the clarification. The scratch occurred long ago.
Common, classic, and worthless mechanical doubling. It can be confusing to new collectors, but there are numerous kinds of doubling that are...
Ditto twice
Separate names with a comma.
