All I see is some light reflection and some kind of "spot".
I have collected errors and varieties for 40 years and use Wexler all the time, usually having to provide a link to all his works when questions...
It looks to me like die deterioration if anything, and still appears to be well within tolerance, but I'm not a modern US variety collector. My...
All I see is reflection from the light source. Where do you see "doubling"?
Absolutely NOT DDR. Die deterioration
Thanks again for your give-aways. I'd like the 2 1864 US 2 cents, because it's a special 100th anniversary of an important date.
Very nice find
Since it's out-of-round, I think post mint damage.
Looks like one to me.
Although the photos aren't entirely clear, you have either machine doubling or die deterioration doubling, both very common and not caused by the...
Yes, I think that it's die deterioration doubling, as said above.
I see a little wear/weakness in the hair and buffalo flank. The wear on the hair isn't at the highest design height. I think high AU to low 60's.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Well, my coin that I use as an icon fits the bill: France 1790/1792 Monneron 5 sols jeton, 31g, 40 mm dia
It looks like either die deterioration or mechanical doubling ... nothing with the die.
If you got it in change from McD's, it is not an MS-65. There were over 1 BILLION, yes, 1 Billion minted that are ALL radar. It is worth 5 cents...
I agree with die deterioration doubling: https://doubleddie.com/144843.html
I think it die deterioration doubling and not a variety or an error. It's what Wexler calls "worthless doubling", but I think that they are neat....
Entry post, so I'm in. I would like the 1864 US 2 cent. That was the year I graduated from high school. I have other '64 US coins, but not the...
I think that I see a little wear in the hair and face. I say AU+
Entry post for the 1864 US 2 cent. '64 was the year I graduated high school and the same year I got sent overseas. I have other 1864 or 1764...
Separate names with a comma.
