I posted my message above without finishing it: '..does it imply that you hope/think that you'll be able to buy a 1974 Bentley with the proceeds...
It's easy - post clear crisp photos of your coin, a short description of what you see as the error on it, and there will be numerous folks here...
.....and a question: Since you posted two coins with the same title, 'Bentley 1974' does that imply you hope/thi
Please post clear crisp photos... ...otherwise we can't tell what the heck your coins actually look like.
Damaged -not an error of any kind or type....sorry
Copper Plating bubble
That's Mechanical Doubling on the reverse. Not a doubled die, and not considered an error. More of a minor anomaly in the minting process, but...
MD Mechanical Doubling
MD, and also a worn die.
Not an error - that 'shrapnel' piece is probably part of the badly environmentally damaged surface event - it looks like it was over the damaged...
Since we weren't there when it was flattened, we can't tell 100% exactly how, but it doesn't matter, imo. Probably put in a vise - but who cares ?
Damaged - just like the other thread
The entire coin, both sides, is badly damaged.
That's just circulation marks - see how baggy the surfaces are? That's not a D/D imo
Mechanical/ejection doubling, imo
It's a flattened D
It won't slab as any error, so you'll be throwing away your postage, submission fees, return postage, etc. And I assume you mean, by $5k, that...
Nice die chip
They're really not laminations - NGC got that one wrong. They are copper plating bubbles or blisters...has nothing to do with metal mixture...
Looks the same to my eyes
Separate names with a comma.
