Keep them if you like, although they're definitely not worth grading. They're not a rare variety, or even MS.
I'll also go XF40.
MS 65, just like I suspected. But, the coin does have amazing eye appeal, like Dave said, so, it could have gone beyond.
[IMG] Jacob J. Lew's signature looks far worse. It's not even a signature- it's a preschool scribble. Let's keep the political bias to the side,...
I'm saying that- I enjoy the sheet. :D Yes, I was looking for one from the 80s. Yes, I am aware of the prices at which the BEP sells uncut sheets....
On the US mint website, a sheet of 5 new (2013 or 2017 series) ones costs $18.50. These notes are 1981 series, and only cost me $10.
The German note- maybe $5. And, the Peter I 500 rouble is worth approximately $10 (not very much). Unfortunately, these notes don't really have a...
That's a very minor "off-center". Worth $1. As @masterswimmer said, spend it.
It IS an uncut sheet! (Possibly split from a larger 32 note sheet, however.)
I'd have to agree with details. The reverse gash is too distracting. Edit: If on the slab, MS63.
I guess, but, even though I bought at 15/16, I'm waiting for 20. Wouldn't make sense to sell it at a couple of bucks over, especially since many...
[ATTACH] For the first time, I’ve bought one of these uncut sheets. Surprisingly, they’re not that easy to come across at a reasonable price. Just...
MS 63
MS 63+... or 64. Great coin. Edit: I'll stick with MS63+.
Looks MS65. Very nice coin!
True, but, not always. For example, when C. Douglas Dillon replaced Robert B. Anderson in 1961, the date on paper currency was still 1950... only...
Looks like an ordinary 2 euro. I can't tell what you mean.
6?! Where did you find it at that low a price? Several years back, I paid $25 for one in much more circulated condition than yours.
I'll also go with MS 63.
Probably some kind of problems that hindered future production of the coin.
Separate names with a comma.
