I posted updated pictures if you're interested
Yes. Pcgs
Updated the post with better images!
Sorry for the weird lighting, took it on the road. [ATTACH] Better image. [ATTACH]
@jackrabb1t is the face a little reflective as well? It looks a lot like a coin I have that was over dipped. I could be wrong.
The question has to be asked because the person that originally posted this was sent here from a different website because they know nothing about...
Why wouldn't you watch the videos? Lol How were you so confident in your opinion without looking at all the evidence. https://imgur.com/a/0PfMiDA...
You're a million percent sure you looked at the video right? Not the picture in the post but the video linked in his first comment?!
I think the OP is long gone, but did you not look at the link he posted with the gifs? If so how can you say its not PL?
Lol no problem man. Thanks for apologizing. I'm glad my pictures could clear it up for you!
MEDIOCRE photography. There is no toning on the obverse except around the edge. See image below. Nasty white spots, but very little toning. It's...
I'm at 65 as well
Definite milk spots.
Not graded, im just looking to see what everyone thinks!
Yes they're toned in unfortunately.
[ATTACH] The obverse is very reflective with some contacts in the field and cheek. Reverse is just oddly toned.
Re-did some pictures of my only slabbed Franklin. MS 64[ATTACH]
The picture of the reverse is playing tricks on my mind. I can't stop seeing it as if the devices were depressed rather than raised.
Thank you for the info! I'm at 65 then.
Was 84' a year of weaker strikes? I thought there was wear and I would say 63/4 but everyone is way higher.
Separate names with a comma.
