MS 65
XF 40. In a newer slab it could have been 45.
PR 68
MS 66 BN
XF 45. The scratches on the holder must be pretty severe. On the obverse it does look cleaned, while on the reverse its harder to tell.
Nice set! The 1934 in the lower row looks to have been cleaned, but the rest look like environmental toning.
Thanks for the 1,000th like!
Looks like the same note- doesn't appear to me that it's been worked with. Different grading criteria possibly?
Nice luster- MS 65. Wouldn't be surprised by a PL grade, either.
Seems natural. Artificial toning would usually be very flashy and noticeable- on your coin you have a light, subtle color.
I haven't posted a thread in a while, but here's a new purchase I wanted to share: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] This is an older, large-style 50 pence coin...
Who are you to talk about a "narrative"? What I shared was a thought I had concerning the matter. You're the most opinionated person on this...
It’s all about appearance. Sort of like marketing- persuading somebody that it’s safe to shop at a given place. People have got the hand...
Why is it that you people are so concerned whether people wear a mask or not? If you don't want to go, fine. Stop attacking people for the choices...
Not really- the serial number isn't low enough. Keep it- it's still pretty cool, and looks like it came from the beginning of a pack. Usually,...
I'll go one higher- MS 67.
MS 66 (without star or FS). Really nice toning on the back, but from what I can see, there are some nicks on the steps.
Probably MS64
Certainly- once the hype is over, it might flop. However, I've looked up the 2019 S burnished Eagle on ebay, and there is one auction where it has...
This isn't too surprising, as the mint has done this with other coins- though not to such an extent. I remember there was a special limited issue...
Separate names with a comma.
