That first D/S nickel has a second strike from fake dies. A uniface reverse strike has a completely different look to it - this one is 100% flat...
Feeder Finger scrapes, imo
Could be feeder finger scrapes Hard to tell for sure from the photos.
'as struck' from used/worn dies. ...and maybe some stains. There are no extra letters
Damaged obv.
Hi All - (I've been out of town since last Thursday) Based on the dark condition of the coin in the OP's first photos, and the one above, it's...
Simple solution: Weigh your Conn. Quarter It will weigh between 5.7 and 5.9 grams. Normal Clad Quarter weight is 5.7 grams Your coin will...
Yes, it's a Plated Conn. quarter.
Very common coin - struck from a worn or overused die. Not an error, and no premium over face value. Every coin struck from that die state will...
Everything you see on that coins surface occurred to it well after it left the Mint.
Mornin' all - Looks fine to me - the 1st strike of the Dime gives the strong reeding - and the photo shows it very 'strong' By the way, there...
Damaged Damaged
Annealing is done to the planchets before they are struck. That's not what they are, however.
....and many of the photos of 'die varieties' were enhanced; ....and many of the photos of double strikes are fakes/counterfeits. It was one of...
Without much better close up photos, the odds are that it's common mechanical doubling - very very common on 64-D dimes. (on both the mintmark and...
Not the Denver overdate ''similar' isn't close enough. It has to be exactly like the photo of the 2/1-D
It's a bit baggy, and has some light hairlines, imo - that's why they called it AU
Because those have different weights, and a completely different look to them - They are easily differentiated between the two types.
The OP's coin is a planchet for a Morgan or Peace Dollar. It was weighed - sometimes the tags have the weight (412 grains official)
Die cracks are raised on the surface of the coin. That's damage on your '72-D Cent - not an error, I'm sorry to say.
Separate names with a comma.
