[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The low 3 in the seller's pics is what first caught my eye, but it is actually the common O-109, not the R-6 O-120.
Although I have a lot of busties that are in 2X2s most of my pics are outside the holder. Here's one in the holder, though. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Not a specialist in Walkers, but, IMO probably the worst strike in the entire series...regardless of what people say about the 41 S.
Nice looking Large Date, Small Letter 1834 O-105. IMO, probably looks more like top photos than the washed out looking second set. As for other...
The drought is over...my first bustie since May. (And for me, that's a long time) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It is. Here's one from a year later, but from the same war. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
And sometimes you can see LIBERTY multiple times. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
A couple of years ago I thought I’d put together a die study on the 1817 O-105 die marriage. This was the last use of obverse die 3-s2. (Used...
Not as large as above, but at 32.5mm my bust halves are my biggest. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
LIBERTY can appear full on bust material down to GOOD [ATTACH] [ATTACH] and even FAIR [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It is counterfeit. There are no 1833's with star 7 pointing to Liberty's cap.
Did someone say he liked Busts? Here's another example of the 1814 O-103 with the accompanying die gouge. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'm not RTE, but no, it doesn't bother me a bit. I daresay that you wasted a whole lot more time posting this thread than you did looking at his...
Separate names with a comma.
